Insights

Continue the conversation from Future of CGT 2026. Explore interviews and reflections from the speakers and contributors who helped shape the first edition of Future of CGT.. These pieces remain available for those who attended, and for anyone interested in the practical questions shaping the future of cell and gene therapy.

 

Why Future of CGT Exists

Why Future of CGT Exists

Future of CGT comes from a simple observation: most conversations in this field stay too high-level to be useful. This piece explores what happens when you shift the focus to real challenges.

From Bench to Bedside: Tom van Meerten on Building an In-Hospital CAR-T Programme

From Bench to Bedside: Tom van Meerten on Building an In-Hospital CAR-T Programme

Hospital-based CAR-T manufacturing is emerging as an alternative to centralized production models. In this interview, Professor Tom van Meerten from UMCG discusses the opportunities and challenges of producing CD19 CAR-T cells within the hospital, and what this approach could mean for the future of cell therapy and patient access.

What Comes After It Works: Frank Staal on Making Gene Therapy Reach Patients 

What Comes After It Works: Frank Staal on Making Gene Therapy Reach Patients 

Many CGT programmes show strong preclinical biology, but still face major challenges when moving from the lab to the clinic. According to Frank Staal, these translational development challenges often stem from early decisions that underestimate patient variability, rely on models optimised for proof-of-concept rather than long-term clinical function, and postpone regulatory or manufacturing considerations until they become difficult and expensive to change. Drawing on experience across the full CGT translational pathway, he shows how early alignment on models, immune monitoring and post-trial strategy can reduce clinical uncertainty and help gene therapy programmes generate evidence that supports real patient benefit beyond the first trial.

What Early Developers Often Miss in Preclinical Work: Margot Pont’s Experience in CGT

What Early Developers Often Miss in Preclinical Work: Margot Pont’s Experience in CGT

Many CGT programmes look strong in preclinical work, yet still stumble once the first patients are dosed. Margot points to recurring causes: models that miss clinical variability, donor material that behaves unlike patient samples, and key development decisions postponed until they become hard to reverse. Her perspective helps teams design studies that better support benefit-risk early on.